Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Germany or Nepal?

Germany, at 735.21 hectares against 647.14 hectares in Nepal as of 2024.

What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Germany and Nepal?

88.07 hectares, with Germany ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Nepal?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Germany vs Nepal: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Germany

735.21 hectares

in 2024

Nepal

647.14 hectares

in 2024

Germany rank

28th

Nepal rank

31st

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Germany
Nepal

How they compare

Germany currently reports 735.21 hectares against 647.14 hectares in Nepal, a difference of 88.07 hectares.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 28th and Nepal ranks 31st of 186 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Germany	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
2000s	996.45 hectares	181.48 hectares	814.98 hectares	Germany
2010s	968.41 hectares	296.05 hectares	672.36 hectares	Germany
2020s	957.64 hectares	619.07 hectares	338.57 hectares	Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Germany or Nepal?: Germany, at 735.21 hectares against 647.14 hectares in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Germany and Nepal?: 88.07 hectares, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Nepal?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Germany and Nepal rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Germany ranks 28th and Nepal ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Nepal: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/germany/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/germany/nepal/">Germany vs Nepal: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.