Georgia vs United Kingdom: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Georgia
46.39 hectares
in 2024
United Kingdom
44.47 hectares
in 2024
Georgia rank
104th
United Kingdom rank
107th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Georgia
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 46.39 hectares against 44.47 hectares in United Kingdom, a difference of 1.92 hectares.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Georgia ranks 104th and United Kingdom ranks 107th of 186 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.61 hectares | 101.89 hectares | 87.28 hectares | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 19.08 hectares | 94.39 hectares | 75.31 hectares | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 36.92 hectares | 44.78 hectares | 7.86 hectares | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Georgia or United Kingdom?
- Georgia, at 46.39 hectares against 44.47 hectares in United Kingdom as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Georgia and United Kingdom?
- 1.92 hectares, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and United Kingdom?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and United Kingdom rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Georgia ranks 104th and United Kingdom ranks 107th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.