Georgia vs New Caledonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Georgia
46.39 hectares
in 2024
New Caledonia
44.78 hectares
in 2024
Georgia rank
104th
New Caledonia rank
106th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Georgia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 46.39 hectares against 44.78 hectares in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.61 hectares.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Georgia ranks 104th and New Caledonia ranks 106th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.61 hectares | 66.5 hectares | 51.89 hectares | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 19.08 hectares | 45.33 hectares | 26.25 hectares | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 36.92 hectares | 20.31 hectares | 16.61 hectares | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Georgia or New Caledonia?
- Georgia, at 46.39 hectares against 44.78 hectares in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Georgia and New Caledonia?
- 1.61 hectares, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and New Caledonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and New Caledonia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Georgia ranks 104th and New Caledonia ranks 106th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.