Georgia vs Lebanon: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Georgia
46.39 hectares
in 2024
Lebanon
49.1 hectares
in 2024
Georgia rank
104th
Lebanon rank
102nd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Georgia
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 49.1 hectares against 46.39 hectares in Georgia, a difference of 2.71 hectares.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Lebanon ahead.
Georgia ranks 104th and Lebanon ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.61 hectares | 65.82 hectares | 51.21 hectares | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 19.08 hectares | 57.66 hectares | 38.58 hectares | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 36.92 hectares | 49.23 hectares | 12.3 hectares | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Georgia or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 49.1 hectares against 46.39 hectares in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Georgia and Lebanon?
- 2.71 hectares, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Lebanon?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Lebanon rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Georgia ranks 104th and Lebanon ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.