Gambia vs Uzbekistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Gambia
0.4498 hectares
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0.3493 hectares
in 2024
Gambia rank
166th
Uzbekistan rank
168th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Gambia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0.4498 hectares against 0.3493 hectares in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.1005 hectares.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.3 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Gambia ranks 166th and Uzbekistan ranks 168th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.13 hectares | 7.61 hectares | 0.5184 hectares | Gambia |
| 2010s | 1.86 hectares | 1.76 hectares | 0.0963 hectares | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0.2399 hectares | 0.3139 hectares | 0.0741 hectares | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Gambia or Uzbekistan?
- Gambia, at 0.4498 hectares against 0.3493 hectares in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Gambia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.1005 hectares, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Uzbekistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Uzbekistan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Gambia ranks 166th and Uzbekistan ranks 168th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.