French Guiana vs Montenegro: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
French Guiana
79.34 hectares
in 2024
Montenegro
78.76 hectares
in 2024
French Guiana rank
94th
Montenegro rank
95th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- French Guiana
- Montenegro
How they compare
French Guiana currently reports 79.34 hectares against 78.76 hectares in Montenegro, a difference of 0.58 hectares.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was French Guiana ahead.
French Guiana ranks 94th and Montenegro ranks 95th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, French Guiana averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Guiana | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 124.69 hectares | 43.49 hectares | 81.2 hectares | French Guiana |
| 2010s | 157.08 hectares | 69.59 hectares | 87.49 hectares | French Guiana |
| 2020s | 81.81 hectares | 83.91 hectares | 2.09 hectares | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, French Guiana or Montenegro?
- French Guiana, at 79.34 hectares against 78.76 hectares in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between French Guiana and Montenegro?
- 0.58 hectares, with French Guiana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Guiana and Montenegro?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do French Guiana and Montenegro rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- French Guiana ranks 94th and Montenegro ranks 95th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.