Finland vs Norway: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Finland
1,215 hectares
in 2024
Norway
1,152 hectares
in 2024
Finland rank
20th
Norway rank
21st
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Finland
- Norway
How they compare
Finland currently reports 1,215 hectares against 1,152 hectares in Norway, a difference of 63 hectares.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 20th and Norway ranks 21st of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,038 hectares | 1,384 hectares | 653.56 hectares | Finland |
| 2010s | 2,271 hectares | 1,811 hectares | 460.48 hectares | Finland |
| 2020s | 1,565 hectares | 1,716 hectares | 151.83 hectares | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Finland or Norway?
- Finland, at 1,215 hectares against 1,152 hectares in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Finland and Norway?
- 63 hectares, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Norway?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Norway rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Finland ranks 20th and Norway ranks 21st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.