What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Eswatini and Rwanda?

6.71 hectares, with Rwanda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Rwanda?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Eswatini

36.04 hectares

in 2024

Rwanda

42.75 hectares

in 2024

Eswatini rank

110th

Rwanda rank

108th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Eswatini
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 42.75 hectares against 36.04 hectares in Eswatini, a difference of 6.71 hectares.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Rwanda ahead.

Eswatini ranks 110th and Rwanda ranks 108th of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	34.79 hectares	39.11 hectares	4.32 hectares	Rwanda
2010s	46.72 hectares	46.06 hectares	0.6599 hectares	Eswatini
2020s	28.24 hectares	36 hectares	7.76 hectares	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Eswatini or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 42.75 hectares against 36.04 hectares in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Eswatini and Rwanda?: 6.71 hectares, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Rwanda?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Rwanda rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Eswatini ranks 110th and Rwanda ranks 108th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/eswatini/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/eswatini/rwanda/">Eswatini vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.