El Salvador vs Slovenia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
El Salvador
117.8 hectares
in 2024
Slovenia
132.54 hectares
in 2024
El Salvador rank
78th
Slovenia rank
77th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- El Salvador
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 132.54 hectares against 117.8 hectares in El Salvador, a difference of 14.74 hectares.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 78th and Slovenia ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 156.63 hectares | 147.5 hectares | 9.13 hectares | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 120.56 hectares | 93.13 hectares | 27.43 hectares | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 110.59 hectares | 114.91 hectares | 4.32 hectares | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, El Salvador or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 132.54 hectares against 117.8 hectares in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between El Salvador and Slovenia?
- 14.74 hectares, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Slovenia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Slovenia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- El Salvador ranks 78th and Slovenia ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.