What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Curacao and Liechtenstein?

0.47 hectares, with Curacao ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Liechtenstein?

20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Curacao vs Liechtenstein: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Curacao

1.58 hectares

in 2024

Liechtenstein

1.11 hectares

in 2024

Curacao rank

157th

Liechtenstein rank

160th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Curacao
Liechtenstein

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 1.58 hectares against 1.11 hectares in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.47 hectares.

That makes Curacao's figure about 1.4 times Liechtenstein's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Liechtenstein ahead.

Curacao ranks 157th and Liechtenstein ranks 160th of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Liechtenstein in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Curacao	Liechtenstein	Difference	Ahead
2000s	1.55 hectares	2.83 hectares	1.28 hectares	Liechtenstein
2010s	0.5158 hectares	1.71 hectares	1.19 hectares	Liechtenstein
2020s	2.28 hectares	1.03 hectares	1.25 hectares	Curacao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Curacao or Liechtenstein?: Curacao, at 1.58 hectares against 1.11 hectares in Liechtenstein as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Curacao and Liechtenstein?: 0.47 hectares, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Liechtenstein?: 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Curacao and Liechtenstein rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Curacao ranks 157th and Liechtenstein ranks 160th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Liechtenstein: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/curacao/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/curacao/liechtenstein/">Curacao vs Liechtenstein: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.