Cuba vs Pakistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Cuba
18.91 hectares
in 2024
Pakistan
17.51 hectares
in 2024
Cuba rank
123rd
Pakistan rank
124th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Pakistan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 18.91 hectares against 17.51 hectares in Pakistan, a difference of 1.4 hectares.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 123rd and Pakistan ranks 124th of 186 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.8 hectares | 10.15 hectares | 88.65 hectares | Cuba |
| 2010s | 99.54 hectares | 5.5 hectares | 94.04 hectares | Cuba |
| 2020s | 47.41 hectares | 9.29 hectares | 38.12 hectares | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Cuba or Pakistan?
- Cuba, at 18.91 hectares against 17.51 hectares in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Cuba and Pakistan?
- 1.4 hectares, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Pakistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Pakistan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 123rd and Pakistan ranks 124th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.