Cuba vs North Macedonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Cuba
18.91 hectares
in 2024
North Macedonia
19.38 hectares
in 2024
Cuba rank
123rd
North Macedonia rank
121st
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 19.38 hectares against 18.91 hectares in Cuba, a difference of 0.47 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 123rd and North Macedonia ranks 121st of 186 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.8 hectares | 23.39 hectares | 75.42 hectares | Cuba |
| 2010s | 99.54 hectares | 25.28 hectares | 74.26 hectares | Cuba |
| 2020s | 47.41 hectares | 23.08 hectares | 24.33 hectares | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Cuba or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 19.38 hectares against 18.91 hectares in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 0.47 hectares, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and North Macedonia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 123rd and North Macedonia ranks 121st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.