Croatia vs Sri Lanka: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Croatia
216.18 hectares
in 2024
Sri Lanka
213.06 hectares
in 2024
Croatia rank
64th
Sri Lanka rank
66th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Croatia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 216.18 hectares against 213.06 hectares in Sri Lanka, a difference of 3.12 hectares.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Croatia ranks 64th and Sri Lanka ranks 66th of 186 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 231.06 hectares | 365.41 hectares | 134.36 hectares | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 129.93 hectares | 495.04 hectares | 365.11 hectares | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 210.34 hectares | 250.27 hectares | 39.93 hectares | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Croatia or Sri Lanka?
- Croatia, at 216.18 hectares against 213.06 hectares in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Croatia and Sri Lanka?
- 3.12 hectares, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sri Lanka?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Sri Lanka rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Croatia ranks 64th and Sri Lanka ranks 66th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.