What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Croatia and Equatorial Guinea?

6.12 hectares, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Equatorial Guinea?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Croatia vs Equatorial Guinea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Croatia

216.18 hectares

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea

222.3 hectares

in 2024

Croatia rank

64th

Equatorial Guinea rank

61st

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Croatia
Equatorial Guinea

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 222.3 hectares against 216.18 hectares in Croatia, a difference of 6.12 hectares.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Croatia ranks 64th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 61st of 186 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Croatia	Equatorial Guinea	Difference	Ahead
2000s	231.06 hectares	376.84 hectares	145.78 hectares	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	129.93 hectares	641.37 hectares	511.44 hectares	Equatorial Guinea
2020s	210.34 hectares	217.89 hectares	7.55 hectares	Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Croatia or Equatorial Guinea?: Equatorial Guinea, at 222.3 hectares against 216.18 hectares in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Croatia and Equatorial Guinea?: 6.12 hectares, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Equatorial Guinea?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Croatia ranks 64th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 61st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Equatorial Guinea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/croatia/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/croatia/equatorial-guinea/">Croatia vs Equatorial Guinea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.