Cote d'Ivoire vs Mexico: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Cote d'Ivoire
1,939 hectares
in 2024
Mexico
2,111 hectares
in 2024
Cote d'Ivoire rank
13th
Mexico rank
11th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 2,111 hectares against 1,939 hectares in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 172 hectares.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Cote d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mexico ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 13th and Mexico ranks 11th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,791 hectares | 3,661 hectares | 1,870 hectares | Mexico |
| 2010s | 3,105 hectares | 2,201 hectares | 903.42 hectares | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 2,576 hectares | 1,951 hectares | 625.43 hectares | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Cote d'Ivoire or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 2,111 hectares against 1,939 hectares in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Cote d'Ivoire and Mexico?
- 172 hectares, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Mexico?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Mexico rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 13th and Mexico ranks 11th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.