Cote d'Ivoire vs South Korea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- South Korea
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 1,939 hectares against 1,422 hectares in South Korea, a difference of 517 hectares.
That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.4 times South Korea's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 13th and South Korea ranks 15th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,791 hectares | 2,018 hectares | 226.51 hectares | South Korea |
| 2010s | 3,105 hectares | 2,156 hectares | 948.13 hectares | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 2,576 hectares | 1,486 hectares | 1,090 hectares | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Cote d'Ivoire or South Korea?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 1,939 hectares against 1,422 hectares in South Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Cote d'Ivoire and South Korea?
- 517 hectares, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and South Korea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and South Korea rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 13th and South Korea ranks 15th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.