Costa Rica vs Montenegro: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Costa Rica
87.66 hectares
in 2024
Montenegro
78.76 hectares
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
92nd
Montenegro rank
95th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Costa Rica
- Montenegro
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 87.66 hectares against 78.76 hectares in Montenegro, a difference of 8.9 hectares.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 92nd and Montenegro ranks 95th of 186 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 384.89 hectares | 43.49 hectares | 341.4 hectares | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 126.95 hectares | 69.59 hectares | 57.36 hectares | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 101.69 hectares | 83.91 hectares | 17.78 hectares | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Montenegro?
- Costa Rica, at 87.66 hectares against 78.76 hectares in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Montenegro?
- 8.9 hectares, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Montenegro?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Montenegro rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Costa Rica ranks 92nd and Montenegro ranks 95th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.