What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Lithuania?

5.18 hectares, with Costa Rica ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Lithuania?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Costa Rica vs Lithuania: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Costa Rica

87.66 hectares

in 2024

Lithuania

82.48 hectares

in 2024

Costa Rica rank

92nd

Lithuania rank

93rd

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Costa Rica
Lithuania

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 87.66 hectares against 82.48 hectares in Lithuania, a difference of 5.18 hectares.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 92nd and Lithuania ranks 93rd of 186 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Costa Rica	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
2000s	384.89 hectares	44.8 hectares	340.09 hectares	Costa Rica
2010s	126.95 hectares	59.8 hectares	67.15 hectares	Costa Rica
2020s	101.69 hectares	63.64 hectares	38.04 hectares	Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Lithuania?: Costa Rica, at 87.66 hectares against 82.48 hectares in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Lithuania?: 5.18 hectares, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Lithuania?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Lithuania rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Costa Rica ranks 92nd and Lithuania ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Lithuania: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/costa-rica/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/costa-rica/lithuania/">Costa Rica vs Lithuania: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.