Democratic Republic of Congo vs Russia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 4,217 hectares against 3,294 hectares in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 923 hectares.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.3 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Russia ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 7th and Russia ranks 6th of 186 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,230 hectares | 4,059 hectares | 829.29 hectares | Russia |
| 2010s | 4,093 hectares | 5,162 hectares | 1,069 hectares | Russia |
| 2020s | 3,039 hectares | 3,790 hectares | 751.27 hectares | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Democratic Republic of Congo or Russia?
- Russia, at 4,217 hectares against 3,294 hectares in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Democratic Republic of Congo and Russia?
- 923 hectares, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Russia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Russia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 7th and Russia ranks 6th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.