What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Chile and Zambia?

5.32 hectares, with Chile ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zambia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Zambia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Chile

234.12 hectares

in 2024

Zambia

228.8 hectares

in 2024

Chile rank

57th

Zambia rank

59th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Chile
Zambia

How they compare

Chile currently reports 234.12 hectares against 228.8 hectares in Zambia, a difference of 5.32 hectares.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 57th and Zambia ranks 59th of 186 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	319.64 hectares	186.69 hectares	132.95 hectares	Chile
2010s	359.05 hectares	342.64 hectares	16.41 hectares	Chile
2020s	346.37 hectares	217.14 hectares	129.23 hectares	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Chile or Zambia?: Chile, at 234.12 hectares against 228.8 hectares in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Chile and Zambia?: 5.32 hectares, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zambia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Chile and Zambia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Chile ranks 57th and Zambia ranks 59th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zambia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/chile/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/chile/zambia/">Chile vs Zambia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.