Chad vs Lesotho: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Chad
0 hectares
in 2024
Lesotho
0.0668 hectares
in 2021
Chad rank
182nd
Lesotho rank
181st
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Chad
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.0668 hectares against 0 hectares in Chad, a difference of 0.0668 hectares.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Lesotho ahead.
Chad ranks 182nd and Lesotho ranks 181st of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.77 hectares | 0.6404 hectares | 2.13 hectares | Chad |
| 2010s | 0.785 hectares | 0.8345 hectares | 0.0495 hectares | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0.0762 hectares | 0.2337 hectares | 0.1575 hectares | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Chad or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 0.0668 hectares against 0 hectares in Chad as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Chad and Lesotho?
- 0.0668 hectares, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Lesotho?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Chad and Lesotho rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Chad ranks 182nd and Lesotho ranks 181st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.