Canada vs Russia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Canada
4,707 hectares
in 2024
Russia
4,217 hectares
in 2024
Canada rank
5th
Russia rank
6th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Canada
- Russia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 4,707 hectares against 4,217 hectares in Russia, a difference of 490 hectares.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Russia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 5th and Russia ranks 6th of 186 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,497 hectares | 4,059 hectares | 3,438 hectares | Canada |
| 2010s | 6,148 hectares | 5,162 hectares | 985.6 hectares | Canada |
| 2020s | 5,713 hectares | 3,790 hectares | 1,923 hectares | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Canada or Russia?
- Canada, at 4,707 hectares against 4,217 hectares in Russia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Canada and Russia?
- 490 hectares, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Russia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Russia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Canada ranks 5th and Russia ranks 6th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.