Cameroon vs South Korea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Cameroon
1,270 hectares
in 2024
South Korea
1,422 hectares
in 2024
Cameroon rank
18th
South Korea rank
15th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Cameroon
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 1,422 hectares against 1,270 hectares in Cameroon, a difference of 152 hectares.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was South Korea ahead.
Cameroon ranks 18th and South Korea ranks 15th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 2 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 931.22 hectares | 2,018 hectares | 1,086 hectares | South Korea |
| 2010s | 2,357 hectares | 2,156 hectares | 200.27 hectares | Cameroon |
| 2020s | 1,623 hectares | 1,486 hectares | 137.67 hectares | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Cameroon or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 1,422 hectares against 1,270 hectares in Cameroon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Cameroon and South Korea?
- 152 hectares, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and South Korea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Cameroon and South Korea rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Cameroon ranks 18th and South Korea ranks 15th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.