Cambodia vs Costa Rica: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Cambodia
96.68 hectares
in 2024
Costa Rica
87.66 hectares
in 2024
Cambodia rank
90th
Costa Rica rank
92nd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Cambodia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 96.68 hectares against 87.66 hectares in Costa Rica, a difference of 9.02 hectares.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Cambodia ranks 90th and Costa Rica ranks 92nd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 172.78 hectares | 384.89 hectares | 212.11 hectares | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 269.62 hectares | 126.95 hectares | 142.67 hectares | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 132.36 hectares | 101.69 hectares | 30.68 hectares | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Cambodia or Costa Rica?
- Cambodia, at 96.68 hectares against 87.66 hectares in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Cambodia and Costa Rica?
- 9.02 hectares, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Costa Rica?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Costa Rica rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Cambodia ranks 90th and Costa Rica ranks 92nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.