Bulgaria vs Netherlands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Bulgaria
92.47 hectares
in 2024
Netherlands
97.53 hectares
in 2024
Bulgaria rank
91st
Netherlands rank
89th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Bulgaria
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 97.53 hectares against 92.47 hectares in Bulgaria, a difference of 5.06 hectares.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Bulgaria's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Netherlands ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 91st and Netherlands ranks 89th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 102.68 hectares | 88.32 hectares | 14.36 hectares | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 79.96 hectares | 114.22 hectares | 34.26 hectares | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 111.38 hectares | 125.62 hectares | 14.24 hectares | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Bulgaria or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 97.53 hectares against 92.47 hectares in Bulgaria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Bulgaria and Netherlands?
- 5.06 hectares, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Netherlands?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Netherlands rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Bulgaria ranks 91st and Netherlands ranks 89th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.