Bulgaria vs Costa Rica: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Bulgaria
92.47 hectares
in 2024
Costa Rica
87.66 hectares
in 2024
Bulgaria rank
91st
Costa Rica rank
92nd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Bulgaria
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 92.47 hectares against 87.66 hectares in Costa Rica, a difference of 4.81 hectares.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 91st and Costa Rica ranks 92nd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 102.68 hectares | 384.89 hectares | 282.21 hectares | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 79.96 hectares | 126.95 hectares | 46.99 hectares | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 111.38 hectares | 101.69 hectares | 9.69 hectares | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Bulgaria or Costa Rica?
- Bulgaria, at 92.47 hectares against 87.66 hectares in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Bulgaria and Costa Rica?
- 4.81 hectares, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Costa Rica?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Costa Rica rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Bulgaria ranks 91st and Costa Rica ranks 92nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.