What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between British Virgin Islands and Chad?

0.0731 hectares, with British Virgin Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Chad?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

British Virgin Islands vs Chad: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

British Virgin Islands

0.0731 hectares

in 2024

Chad

0 hectares

in 2024

British Virgin Islands rank

180th

Chad rank

182nd

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

British Virgin Islands
Chad

How they compare

British Virgin Islands currently reports 0.0731 hectares against 0 hectares in Chad, a difference of 0.0731 hectares.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was British Virgin Islands ahead.

British Virgin Islands ranks 180th and Chad ranks 182nd of 186 countries.

British Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	British Virgin Islands	Chad	Difference	Ahead
2000s	2.7 hectares	2.05 hectares	0.6548 hectares	British Virgin Islands
2010s	4.49 hectares	0.785 hectares	3.7 hectares	British Virgin Islands
2020s	1.3 hectares	0.1372 hectares	1.16 hectares	British Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, British Virgin Islands or Chad?: British Virgin Islands, at 0.0731 hectares against 0 hectares in Chad as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between British Virgin Islands and Chad?: 0.0731 hectares, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Chad?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do British Virgin Islands and Chad rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: British Virgin Islands ranks 180th and Chad ranks 182nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

British Virgin Islands vs Chad: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/british-virgin-islands/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/british-virgin-islands/chad/">British Virgin Islands vs Chad: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.