Botswana vs Iraq: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Botswana
0 hectares
in 2024
Iraq
0 hectares
in 2023
Botswana rank
182nd
Iraq rank
182nd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Botswana
- Iraq
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Iraq, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 182nd and Iraq ranks 182nd of 186 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.05 hectares | 1.45 hectares | 0.399 hectares | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0.3455 hectares | 0.6015 hectares | 0.256 hectares | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Botswana or Iraq?
- Botswana, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Iraq as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Botswana and Iraq?
- 0 hectares, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iraq?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Iraq rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Botswana ranks 182nd and Iraq ranks 182nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.