Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Puerto Rico: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 153.22 hectares against 136.25 hectares in Puerto Rico, a difference of 16.97 hectares.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 73rd and Puerto Rico ranks 75th of 186 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.55 hectares | 455.69 hectares | 399.14 hectares | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 86.3 hectares | 728.98 hectares | 642.68 hectares | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 157.37 hectares | 204.41 hectares | 47.04 hectares | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Puerto Rico?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 153.22 hectares against 136.25 hectares in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Puerto Rico?
- 16.97 hectares, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Puerto Rico?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Puerto Rico rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 73rd and Puerto Rico ranks 75th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.