Belgium vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 170.69 hectares against 153.22 hectares in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 17.47 hectares.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 71st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 132.99 hectares | 56.55 hectares | 76.45 hectares | Belgium |
| 2010s | 170.05 hectares | 86.3 hectares | 83.75 hectares | Belgium |
| 2020s | 242.65 hectares | 157.37 hectares | 85.28 hectares | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Belgium or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Belgium, at 170.69 hectares against 153.22 hectares in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 17.47 hectares, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Belgium ranks 71st and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.