Barbados vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 1.5 hectares against 1.03 hectares in Sint Maarten (Dutch part), a difference of 0.47 hectares.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.5 times Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 158th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 161st of 186 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.62 hectares | 2.19 hectares | 0.4344 hectares | Barbados |
| 2010s | 2.8 hectares | 1.9 hectares | 0.8933 hectares | Barbados |
| 2020s | 1.49 hectares | 0.6262 hectares | 0.8652 hectares | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Barbados or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- Barbados, at 1.5 hectares against 1.03 hectares in Sint Maarten (Dutch part) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Barbados and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- 0.47 hectares, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 158th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 161st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.