Barbados vs Kyrgyzstan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Barbados
1.5 hectares
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
1.13 hectares
in 2024
Barbados rank
158th
Kyrgyzstan rank
159th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 1.5 hectares against 1.13 hectares in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.37 hectares.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 158th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 159th of 186 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.62 hectares | 1.45 hectares | 1.17 hectares | Barbados |
| 2010s | 5.94 hectares | 2.11 hectares | 3.83 hectares | Barbados |
| 2020s | 1.95 hectares | 0.7375 hectares | 1.21 hectares | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Barbados or Kyrgyzstan?
- Barbados, at 1.5 hectares against 1.13 hectares in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Barbados and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.37 hectares, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Kyrgyzstan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 158th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 159th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.