Azerbaijan vs Pakistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Azerbaijan
15.25 hectares
in 2024
Pakistan
17.51 hectares
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
126th
Pakistan rank
124th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Azerbaijan
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 17.51 hectares against 15.25 hectares in Azerbaijan, a difference of 2.26 hectares.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 126th and Pakistan ranks 124th of 186 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.61 hectares | 10.15 hectares | 10.46 hectares | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 9.53 hectares | 5.5 hectares | 4.03 hectares | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 9.67 hectares | 9.29 hectares | 0.3853 hectares | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Azerbaijan or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 17.51 hectares against 15.25 hectares in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Azerbaijan and Pakistan?
- 2.26 hectares, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Pakistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Pakistan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Azerbaijan ranks 126th and Pakistan ranks 124th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.