Australia vs Norway: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Australia
1,238 hectares
in 2024
Norway
1,152 hectares
in 2024
Australia rank
19th
Norway rank
21st

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

  • Australia
  • Norway
02.0k4.0k6.0k200120122024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1,238 hectares against 1,152 hectares in Norway, a difference of 86 hectares.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 19th and Norway ranks 21st of 186 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 3,956 hectares 1,384 hectares 2,571 hectares Australia
2010s 2,969 hectares 1,811 hectares 1,158 hectares Australia
2020s 1,777 hectares 1,716 hectares 60.76 hectares Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Australia or Norway?
Australia, at 1,238 hectares against 1,152 hectares in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Australia and Norway?
86 hectares, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Norway?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Australia and Norway rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
Australia ranks 19th and Norway ranks 21st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Norway: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/australia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/australia/norway/">Australia vs Norway: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit
hectares
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.