What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Australia and Finland?

23 hectares, with Australia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Finland: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Australia

1,238 hectares

in 2024

Finland

1,215 hectares

in 2024

Australia rank

19th

Finland rank

20th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Australia
Finland

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1,238 hectares against 1,215 hectares in Finland, a difference of 23 hectares.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 19th and Finland ranks 20th of 186 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Finland	Difference	Ahead
2000s	3,956 hectares	2,038 hectares	1,918 hectares	Australia
2010s	2,969 hectares	2,271 hectares	697.29 hectares	Australia
2020s	1,777 hectares	1,565 hectares	212.59 hectares	Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Australia or Finland?: Australia, at 1,238 hectares against 1,215 hectares in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Australia and Finland?: 23 hectares, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Australia and Finland rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Australia ranks 19th and Finland ranks 20th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Finland: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/australia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/australia/finland/">Australia vs Finland: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.