Argentina vs Norway: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Argentina
851.01 hectares
in 2024
Norway
1,152 hectares
in 2024
Argentina rank
24th
Norway rank
21st
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Argentina
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 1,152 hectares against 851.01 hectares in Argentina, a difference of 300.99 hectares.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.4 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 24th and Norway ranks 21st of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,295 hectares | 1,384 hectares | 910.56 hectares | Argentina |
| 2010s | 2,423 hectares | 1,811 hectares | 612.33 hectares | Argentina |
| 2020s | 1,220 hectares | 1,716 hectares | 496.64 hectares | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Argentina or Norway?
- Norway, at 1,152 hectares against 851.01 hectares in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Argentina and Norway?
- 300.99 hectares, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Norway?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Norway rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Argentina ranks 24th and Norway ranks 21st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.