Antigua and Barbuda vs Bangladesh: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Bangladesh
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 13.4 hectares against 10.69 hectares in Bangladesh, a difference of 2.71 hectares.
That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.3 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 128th and Bangladesh ranks 131st of 186 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Bangladesh | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.94 hectares | 64.58 hectares | 50.64 hectares | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 7.68 hectares | 124.69 hectares | 117.01 hectares | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 10.35 hectares | 23.8 hectares | 13.45 hectares | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Antigua and Barbuda or Bangladesh?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 13.4 hectares against 10.69 hectares in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Antigua and Barbuda and Bangladesh?
- 2.71 hectares, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Bangladesh?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Bangladesh rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 128th and Bangladesh ranks 131st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.