Anguilla vs San Marino: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Anguilla
0.2195 hectares
in 2022
San Marino
0.1673 hectares
in 2024
Anguilla rank
174th
San Marino rank
175th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Anguilla
- San Marino
How they compare
Anguilla currently reports 0.2195 hectares against 0.1673 hectares in San Marino, a difference of 0.0522 hectares.
That makes Anguilla's figure about 1.3 times San Marino's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Anguilla ahead.
Anguilla ranks 174th and San Marino ranks 175th of 186 countries.
Anguilla has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Anguilla | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.47 hectares | 0.0871 hectares | 3.38 hectares | Anguilla |
| 2010s | 0.8013 hectares | 0.1784 hectares | 0.6228 hectares | Anguilla |
| 2020s | 1.12 hectares | 0.3346 hectares | 0.7812 hectares | Anguilla |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Anguilla or San Marino?
- Anguilla, at 0.2195 hectares against 0.1673 hectares in San Marino as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Anguilla and San Marino?
- 0.0522 hectares, with Anguilla ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Anguilla and San Marino?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Anguilla and San Marino rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Anguilla ranks 174th and San Marino ranks 175th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.