Angola vs Taiwan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Angola
365.24 hectares
in 2024
Taiwan
371.37 hectares
in 2024
Angola rank
41st
Taiwan rank
40th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Angola
- Taiwan
How they compare
Taiwan currently reports 371.37 hectares against 365.24 hectares in Angola, a difference of 6.13 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 41st and Taiwan ranks 40th of 186 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 898.05 hectares | 215.73 hectares | 682.32 hectares | Angola |
| 2010s | 992.43 hectares | 238.03 hectares | 754.4 hectares | Angola |
| 2020s | 352.64 hectares | 287.27 hectares | 65.37 hectares | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Angola or Taiwan?
- Taiwan, at 371.37 hectares against 365.24 hectares in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Angola and Taiwan?
- 6.13 hectares, with Taiwan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Taiwan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Taiwan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Angola ranks 41st and Taiwan ranks 40th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.