Angola vs Mozambique: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Angola
365.24 hectares
in 2024
Mozambique
452.02 hectares
in 2024
Angola rank
41st
Mozambique rank
38th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Angola
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 452.02 hectares against 365.24 hectares in Angola, a difference of 86.78 hectares.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 41st and Mozambique ranks 38th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 898.05 hectares | 762.46 hectares | 135.59 hectares | Angola |
| 2010s | 992.43 hectares | 703.37 hectares | 289.07 hectares | Angola |
| 2020s | 352.64 hectares | 422.36 hectares | 69.72 hectares | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Angola or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 452.02 hectares against 365.24 hectares in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Angola and Mozambique?
- 86.78 hectares, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Mozambique?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Mozambique rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Angola ranks 41st and Mozambique ranks 38th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.