Mongolia vs Sweden: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate
Mongolia
-14.29 % change on previous year
in 2019
Sweden
-14.36 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mongolia rank
114th
Sweden rank
115th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate over time
- Mongolia
- Sweden
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -14.29 % change on previous year against -14.36 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0.07 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sweden ahead.
Mongolia ranks 114th and Sweden ranks 115th of 180 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.28 % change on previous year | 27.32 % change on previous year | 63.97 % change on previous year | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 75.38 % change on previous year | 12.6 % change on previous year | 62.78 % change on previous year | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate, Mongolia or Sweden?
- Mongolia, at -14.29 % change on previous year against -14.36 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate between Mongolia and Sweden?
- 0.07 % change on previous year, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sweden?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Sweden rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate?
- Mongolia ranks 114th and Sweden ranks 115th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.