Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate

Mauritius
237.06 % change on previous year
in 2014
New Caledonia
279.53 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mauritius rank
6th
New Caledonia rank
5th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate over time

  • Mauritius
  • New Caledonia
-1000100200300400200220132024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 279.53 % change on previous year against 237.06 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 42.47 % change on previous year.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 6th and New Caledonia ranks 5th of 180 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius New Caledonia Difference Ahead
2000s 65.02 % change on previous year 42.08 % change on previous year 22.95 % change on previous year Mauritius
2010s 57.22 % change on previous year 17.33 % change on previous year 39.89 % change on previous year Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate, Mauritius or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 279.53 % change on previous year against 237.06 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate between Mauritius and New Caledonia?
42.47 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate?
Mauritius ranks 6th and New Caledonia ranks 5th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/new-caledonia/">Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 3,855 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.