Libya vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate
Libya
-28.61 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-27.88 % change on previous year
in 2024
Libya rank
134th
Zimbabwe rank
133rd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate over time
- Libya
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports -27.88 % change on previous year against -28.61 % change on previous year in Libya, a difference of 0.73 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Libya ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.29 % change on previous year | 19.05 % change on previous year | 7.76 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 80.23 % change on previous year | -17.82 % change on previous year | 98.05 % change on previous year | Libya |
| 2020s | -28.61 % change on previous year | -27.88 % change on previous year | 0.7254 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate, Libya or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at -27.88 % change on previous year against -28.61 % change on previous year in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate between Libya and Zimbabwe?
- 0.73 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate?
- Libya ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.