Iraq vs Vanuatu: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate
Iraq
-94.46 % change on previous year
in 2013
Vanuatu
-89.06 % change on previous year
in 2024
Iraq rank
176th
Vanuatu rank
174th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate over time
- Iraq
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports -89.06 % change on previous year against -94.46 % change on previous year in Iraq, a difference of 5.4 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Iraq ranks 176th and Vanuatu ranks 174th of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 135.75 % change on previous year | 31.32 % change on previous year | 104.43 % change on previous year | Iraq |
| 2010s | -93 % change on previous year | 74.79 % change on previous year | 167.79 % change on previous year | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate, Iraq or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at -89.06 % change on previous year against -94.46 % change on previous year in Iraq as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate between Iraq and Vanuatu?
- 5.4 % change on previous year, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Vanuatu?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2013.
- How do Iraq and Vanuatu rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate?
- Iraq ranks 176th and Vanuatu ranks 174th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.