Eswatini vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate

Eswatini
30.4 % change on previous year
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
33.8 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini rank
41st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
38th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
-1000100200300400200220132024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 33.8 % change on previous year against 30.4 % change on previous year in Eswatini, a difference of 3.4 % change on previous year.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Eswatini ranks 41st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 38th of 180 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 91.05 % change on previous year 9.36 % change on previous year 81.69 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s 43.2 % change on previous year -3.19 % change on previous year 46.39 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s 5.3 % change on previous year 24.68 % change on previous year 19.38 % change on previous year Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate, Eswatini or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 33.8 % change on previous year against 30.4 % change on previous year in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate between Eswatini and Turks and Caicos Islands?
3.4 % change on previous year, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Turks and Caicos Islands?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate?
Eswatini ranks 41st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 38th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Eswatini vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 3,855 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.