Chad vs Uzbekistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate
Chad
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Uzbekistan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Chad rank
178th
Uzbekistan rank
178th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate over time
- Chad
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Chad currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 178th and Uzbekistan ranks 178th of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.31 % change on previous year | 282.25 % change on previous year | 213.94 % change on previous year | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 87.08 % change on previous year | 18.77 % change on previous year | 68.31 % change on previous year | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate, Chad or Uzbekistan?
- Chad, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate between Chad and Uzbekistan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Uzbekistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2013.
- How do Chad and Uzbekistan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate?
- Chad ranks 178th and Uzbekistan ranks 178th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.