Botswana vs Iraq: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate
Botswana
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Iraq
-94.46 % change on previous year
in 2013
Botswana rank
178th
Iraq rank
176th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate over time
- Botswana
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports -94.46 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Botswana, a difference of 5.54 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Iraq ahead.
Botswana ranks 178th and Iraq ranks 176th of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63 % change on previous year | 135.75 % change on previous year | 72.75 % change on previous year | Iraq |
| 2010s | -41.42 % change on previous year | -91.53 % change on previous year | 50.11 % change on previous year | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate, Botswana or Iraq?
- Iraq, at -94.46 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Botswana as of 2013.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate between Botswana and Iraq?
- 5.54 % change on previous year, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iraq?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2010.
- How do Botswana and Iraq rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate?
- Botswana ranks 178th and Iraq ranks 176th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.