Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Central African Republic: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
55.02 % change on previous year
in 2020
Central African Republic
57.24 % change on previous year
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
28th
Central African Republic rank
27th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Central African Republic
-1000100200300400200220132024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 57.24 % change on previous year against 55.02 % change on previous year in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 2.22 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 28th and Central African Republic ranks 27th of 180 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba averaged higher in 1 and Central African Republic in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Central African Republic Difference Ahead
2000s -62.92 % change on previous year 137.87 % change on previous year 200.79 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2010s -66.44 % change on previous year -1.82 % change on previous year 64.62 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2020s 55.02 % change on previous year 12.69 % change on previous year 42.33 % change on previous year Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Central African Republic?
Central African Republic, at 57.24 % change on previous year against 55.02 % change on previous year in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Central African Republic?
2.22 % change on previous year, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Central African Republic?
7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Central African Republic rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 28th and Central African Republic ranks 27th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Central African Republic: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-annual-growth-rate/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-annual-growth-rate/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/central-african-republic/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Central African Republic: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 3,855 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Tree cover loss by dominant driver. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.