Trinidad and Tobago vs Palestine, State of: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance
Trinidad and Tobago
82.01
in 2019
Palestine, State of
81.45
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago rank
106th
Palestine, State of rank
109th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 82.01 against 81.45 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.56.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 106th and Palestine, State of ranks 109th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance, Trinidad and Tobago or Palestine, State of?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 82.01 against 81.45 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance between Trinidad and Tobago and Palestine, State of?
- 0.56, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Palestine, State of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Palestine, State of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 106th and Palestine, State of ranks 109th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.