Solomon Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance
Solomon Islands
85.15
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
82.01
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
103rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
106th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance over time
- Solomon Islands
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 85.15 against 82.01 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 3.14.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 103rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 106th of 191 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance, Solomon Islands or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Solomon Islands, at 85.15 against 82.01 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance between Solomon Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 3.14, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Solomon Islands and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- Solomon Islands ranks 103rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 106th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.